[hwbot] wPrime 32m Ranking

[HWbot]

WPrime 32M Ranking
----------------------------------------------------
WPrime is a quick and easy way to measure your processor performance

download here

Rules
- don't use multiple nicknames
- only post scores belonging to you
- 32M calculation only
- use the online submission function of wprime

Guidelines
- format your score as follows: [hwbot] score - system description [/hwbot]
- try not to use abbreviations. eg. 'opteron 146' is ok, '146' is too short.
- format processor overclock like 'A64 3200+ @ 2850Mhz' or 'A64 3200+ @ 2.85Ghz', format videocard speed as 'R9800 @ 350/333Mhz'.
- allowed score formats: '120.34' or '120.34s' or '120.34sec' or '1m 120.233s' or '1h 1m 120.233s'
- don't use text layout (bold, italic) or hyperlinks in your system description.

bot info
moderators: noxon, Nosfer@tu
members who changed team: no one
options: update ranking now

team ranking - hall of fame

rank - top 10 average - team name - weekly & monthly rankchange - links
1. 4.34 PURE - ~ ~ - website
2. 4.49 i4memory.com - ~ +1 - website - forum
3. 4.50 HardwareLuxx Germany - ~ +3 - website
4. 4.54 Russian Overs Team - +4 +5 - website
5. 4.57 H.O.T. - -1 ~ - website - forum
...
37. 7.53 Hardware Canucks - -1-2 - website
38. 7.55 OcTeamDenmark - -1 +8 - website - forum
39. 7.66 EXTREME Overclocking - -1-6 - website

member ranking - hall of fame - more

• 1. Qartweli (Overclockers.ge) - 1.92 - no description
  2. arch3990 (HardwareLuxx Germany) - 2.73 - 4x OPTERON 8439SE
  3. Krohpit (Russian Overs Team) - 3.21 - two dual channel memory node
  ...
  1. Nanok - 4sec 610ms - Core i7 Extreme 975@5211mhz - no description
  2. noxon - 4sec 770ms - Core i7 Extreme 965@5154mhz - OCTeamDK @ Roskilde Festival 2009 -- Zotac GTX295 -- DFI T3eH8 -- Intel 965 -- Patriot 1600MHz cl8 -- CPU -145c
  3. slaske6 - 4sec 940ms - Xeon W3520@4880mhz - no description
  4. Rasmus66 - 5sec 120ms - Xeon W3540@4720mhz -
  5. Pederrs - 5sec 480ms - Core i7 920@4611mhz - no description
  6. Giraffen - 5sec 810ms - Core i7 920@4713mhz - Classified test_xp_no tweaks
  7. Nosfer@tu - 9sec 620ms - Core 2 QX6850 (3.00Ghz)@4750mhz - From my first time becnhing alone
  8. Carpe^Diem - 9sec 800ms - Core 2 Q6700 (2.66Ghz)@4400mhz - no description
  9. Jackel - 9sec 930ms - Core 2 Q9550 (2.83Ghz)@4114mhz -
  10. Wise Guy - 15sec 390ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@1980mhz - Q6600 @ 3GHz
  11. Dani_boy - 16sec 720ms - Core 2 E8200 (2.67Ghz)@4760mhz - no description
  12. Dazebabz - 20sec 100ms - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz)@4005mhz - First try
  13. Nik@_N0body - 20sec 280ms - Core 2 E8200 (2.67Ghz)@3800mhz -
  14. Ginner - 21sec 330ms - Xeon 3070@4200mhz - Xeon UP 3070 @ 4,2 GHz on Asus Commando, 2 GB Dominator PC8500
  15. -J- - 1min 14sec 830ms - Pentium 4 3.0Ghz Northwood@3675mhz - no description
  
  

wPrime 32m Core 2 Duo subranking - hall of fame - performance statistics - more

• 1. giorgos th. (H.O.T.) - 11.62 - de-freezing...
  2. dinos22 (i4memory.com) - 11.75 - no description
  3. Smoke (Russian Overs Team) - 11.94 - no description
  ...
  1. Nanok - 13sec 280ms - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz)@5806mhz - no description
  2. noxon - 13sec 480ms - Core 2 E8600 (3.33Ghz)@5623mhz - E8600 on dice
  3. Dani_boy - 16sec 720ms - Core 2 E8200 (2.67Ghz)@4760mhz - no description
  4. Dazebabz - 20sec 100ms - Core 2 E8400 (3.0Ghz)@4005mhz - First try
  5. Nik@_N0body - 20sec 280ms - Core 2 E8200 (2.67Ghz)@3800mhz -
  6. Nosfer@tu - 26sec 390ms - Core 2 E8500 (3.17Ghz) - no description
  
  

wPrime 32m Core 2 Quad subranking - hall of fame - performance statistics - more

• 1. Jor3llBR/Elano (XtremeSystems) - 7.61 - no description
  2. thebluemeanie1 (XtremeSystems) - 7.94 - no description
  3. Asgate (Team Estonia) - 8.03 -
  ...
  1. Carpe^Diem - 9sec 800ms - Core 2 Q6700 (2.66Ghz)@4400mhz - no description
  2. Jackel - 9sec 930ms - Core 2 Q9550 (2.83Ghz)@4114mhz -
  3. Pederrs - 10sec 200ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@4524mhz - no description
  4. Wise Guy - 15sec 390ms - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz)@1980mhz - Q6600 @ 3GHz
  
  

wPrime 32m Pentium 4 Celeron subranking - hall of fame - performance statistics - more

• 1. MaSell (Team OCX) - 43.00 - no description
  2. Nordling (Topmods.NET) - 46.80 - no description
  3. F.O.G.N.A. (PcTuner.net OC Team) - 46.89 - no description
  ...
  1. noxon - 59sec 720ms - Celeron LGA775 347@6256mhz - no description
  2. Pederrs - 1min 10sec 620ms - Celeron LGA775 360@6006mhz - Asus Striker Extreme no mods, all on Auto - Vcore = 1,7750V. Single Stage NL11F compressor.
  3. Ginner - 1min 19sec 340ms - Celeron s478 330@4553.20mhz - no description
  
  

wPrime 32m Pentium 4 s478 subranking - hall of fame - performance statistics - more

• 1. George_o/c (H.O.T.) - 53.21 - Testing new kingston bh5 I got here ... So far 270MHz 2-2-2-5 1T is doable And no that new Prescott doesn't need that Vcore for 4830, but for 49xx ... hehe ... Also testing new nLited XP + SP2 setup ... so far, good wPrime 1024M next
  2. hs (pc-overware.be) - 55.56 - no description
  3. West-87 (Z.O.T.) - 55.72 - no description
  ...
  1. -J- - 1min 14sec 830ms - Pentium 4 3.0Ghz Northwood@3675mhz - no description
  2. noxon - 1min 15sec 360ms - Pentium 4 3.0Ghz Prescott@4054mhz - no description
  3. Ginner - 1min 40sec 890ms - Pentium 4 2.6Ghz C Northwood (HT)@2604mhz - P4 Northwood C 2.6 GHz
  
  

wPrime 32m Xeon subranking - hall of fame - performance statistics - more

• 1. dbode (HardwareLuxx Germany) - 3.95 - no description
  2. Agent500 (HardwareLuxx Germany) - 4.27 - Agent500 (HardwareLuxx Germany)
  3. FoX [Hard-Concept.Net] (Team OCX) - 4.33 - FoX @ Alcarras Lan Party 2009
  ...
  1. slaske6 - 4sec 940ms - Xeon W3520@4880mhz - no description
  2. Rasmus66 - 5sec 120ms - Xeon W3540@4720mhz -
  3. Nanok - 5sec 370ms - Xeon W3540@4800mhz - no description
  4. Carpe^Diem - 14sec 550ms - Xeon 3210@3000mhz - no description
  5. Pederrs - 20sec 450ms - Xeon 3060@4500mhz - no description
  6. Ginner - 21sec 330ms - Xeon 3070@4200mhz - Xeon UP 3070 @ 4,2 GHz on Asus Commando, 2 GB Dominator PC8500
  
  

generated by hwbot - http://www.hwbot.org - info@hwbot.org

[noxon]

How to post a result correct so the Bot can scan it:


Your result have to look like this:

[hwbot]Nick - Score - CPU model@MHz - GFX model@MHz - Other hardware for the description[/hwbot]

Example:

[hwbot]noxon - 14660 - 8800GTX @ 648/2000 - E8400@4601MHz - 2*1GB PC5300@1227MHz 5-5-4-8[/hwbot]

Your post should also contain a link to a screenshot and to Futuremark ORB for 3D and PCMark.
U can read the rules for all benchmarks here, please read them so ur result don't get deleted!

Bugs:
E8400 is missing somewhere in the database at the moment, so u have to
correct it yourself on www.hwbot.org maybe other hardware is missing too?..

If i write it like this; 2x1GB PC5300... instead of 2*1GB PC5300... the bot thinks
im running with 2x 8800GTX in SLI, weird bug..

There might be other bugs so if u encounter any problems, feel free to contact me.


Guides:
Guide to joining hwbot.
How to join a team.
How to authenticate your login
How to submit a result.

Other guides and Frequently Asked Questions